Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Cancer and "The New Medicine"

There is a branch of medicine (although it's not really "medicine" because it's currently unregulated and I know a lot of chiropractors who use it) called functional medicine

Mark Hyman, M.D., Chairman of the Institute of Functional Medicine wrote a recent article for The Huffington Post.  In this article, he discussed the proceedings for TEDMED, specifically on the treatment and prevention of cancer in the United States, a disease which continues to rise.  It's a very informative article focusing on the new discipline of functional medicine.  If you've got a minute, it's a very worthwhile read.(Thanks for the reference, Satya.)

Personally, I don't see functional medicine as the be-all and end-all of the improvement of health in the US, but I do see it as a major step up from the current crisis-centered system that poses as "health" care here.  Basically, I see it as a step in the right direction, a step towards wellness.

Why a "step up"? 

I say a step up because at least functional medicine recognizes that the body's natural state is health, not disease and that if disease is present it is due to a deficiency or toxicity in the environment.  Functional medicine is performed using a series of symptom questionnaires and laboratory tests to determine WHY a system of the body is out of balance (rather than simply naming the disease and treating it with a drug).  The remedies offered by functional medicine are usually "natural" supplements and whole foods that treat deficiencies, diet modification, and lifestyle changes (interesting concept).  Another focus of functional medicine is on environmental toxicity and removal of heavy metals and other substances that pollute the body (like sugar).

While I do see functional medicine as a better way to deal with chronic diseases like America's top killers of heart disease, cancer, type 2 diabetes, obesity, depression, etc, I do not see it as a replacement for wellness.  This is to say that even after you have "treated" the effects of the problem, to be whole you must conitnue to give the body what it needs and stay away from the bad stuff.  Doing this would provide the appropriate environment where disease would have been unable to exist in the first place.

Unfortunately, as a society, we have not yet been conditioned to seek this type of care and it may be a while yet before people come around to wellness, so for now functional medicine may play a critical role in slowly moving us towards improved health.

The Body as a Garden

Here is an excerpt from Dr. Hyman's article which discusses the treatment of cancer, and if you've read my blog before, it may sound familiar:
"Traditionally, we have focused on late-stage curative care, and in doing so, we have missed the thinking and the treatments focused on changing the underlying conditions that led to the cancer in the first place. Diet, lifestyle, thoughts, and environmental toxins all interact with our genes to change the landscape of our health."
As I see it, to "treat" a disease without discussing why the illness developed in the first place and how to prevent future occurences is a disservice to the patient.  The article continues:
"We have been asking the wrong question about cancer. We have asked "what": What tumor do you have? What kind of chemotherapy, surgery or radiation is needed for that tumor? What is your prognosis? Instead, we need to be asking "why" and "how": Why did this cancer grow? How can you change the conditions that feed and support cancer-cell growth? How did the terrain of your garden become a host to such an invasive weed?

"Surprisingly, scientific literature is abundant with evidence that diet, exercise, thoughts, feelings and environmental toxins all influence the initiation, growth and progression of cancer. If a nutrient-poor diet full of sugar, lack of exercise, chronic stress, persistent pollutants and heavy metals can cause cancer, could it be that a nutrient-dense, plant-based diet, physical activity, changing thoughts and reactions to stress, and detoxification might treat the garden in which cancer grows? Treat the soil, not the plant. It is a foundational principle of sustainable agriculture, and of sustainable health."
I see the next decade as a time when an awakening will be brought about in the American public.  Where they will no longer settle for the status quo when it comes to diseases and conditions and treatments, but where they will begin to ask better questions and be given better answers.  I hope to be a part of this movement by continuing my research into what IS the appropriate environment for the human being.  An environment where diseases like cancer, heart disease, and diabetes are unable to exist. 

In my eyes, these illnesses exist for two reasons:  People have been given the WRONG advice when it comes to lifestyle (especially what to eat) AND people simply do not believe that lifestyle matters that much as a result of social conditioning (family, friends, school, TV, government, and doctors).

I will continue to strive to correct both of these reasons for our illnesses by sharing up-to-date, scientific information so that you, the reader, can make a conscious decision.  Having acces to this information will reconnect Americans to what they really want but have been missing - freedom to choose sickness or health rather than be victim to circumstances brought on by an IGNOR-ant system.
Cancer is just the beginning - Dr. Steve

As a personal prediction and this is only a guess - I think functional medicine will take over the majority of medicine's current patient load (chronic disease) in the next 15 years which means the drug companies that supply most of the treatment will need to find another line of work (vaccines?) as they will be replaced to a large degree by unpatentable natural supplements.  But of course, this depends on how strong a grip pharmaceutical companies can maintain on the hearts and minds of the American public (TV/magazine/internet advertising).



Reference:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-mark-hyman/cancer-new-science-on-how_b_779936.html

4 comments:

  1. I agree that the abuse of drugs such as Hydrocodone can impair the health of the patient, but it is also clear to say that are prescribed by the doctor as the most effective against pain, and disease of cancer needs to be counteracted in this way for the type of pain suffered by the patient, says Findrxonline this is determined by the doctor.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Judloved,

    It's great to have you reading, welcome.

    I agree that pain management is important for the patient who is suffering from the effects of cancer and that a doctor is the only one who should make the determination about what drugs should be used. However, if you will read other posts on my blog, you will gather my intent which is to say that any drug or surgery treatment of an already existing cancer (or any other disease) does NOTHING to affect the real problem. Dr. Hyman is of a similar opinion and his article is definitely worth a read.

    The real problem as I hinted at is that MOST of these diseases are highly preventable and treatment without addressing the reason the disease was able to exist is a disservice to the "health" care consumer.

    When you supply a healthy environment, the natural expression is health, this is entirely left out of treatments focusing on drugs and/or surgery.

    Here is a summary:

    http://balancedbodyandmind.blogspot.com/2010/08/wellness-made-simple.html

    In health,

    Dr. Steve Perry

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think this is a good step. I agree - treating the symptoms (including cancer) should be only part of the attack.

    I do feel like this may over-simplify things though. I think the idea is generally applicable, but the feeling I'm getting (in this post and overall) is that if you just do the right things (food, environment, movement, positive thoughts, proper alignment) then you will always have complete wellness unless you have a physical accident. Maybe this isn't what is meant, but it is what the posts seem to be saying to me.

    But sometimes an illness comes anyway, even if you're trying to do all the right things. I'm thinking especially when germs are involved. Often, when our bodies are strong, we are able to take care of germs before they overwhelm our body and we never notice it ourselves. But sometimes it doesn't work that way. Sometimes it is determined more by what you are exposed to (despite what precautions you may take) or even your genes. Take HIV. Though it often comes because of a life-style choice, that is not always the case. And having an amazing immune system doesn't exactly help as the virus feeds on the immune cells that are supposed to be stopping viruses. But some people are immune still because, genetically, their cells are resistant to the virus. Or, to take the garden analogy, sometimes the very things that make the soil perfect for your garden plants actually makes it extremely perfect for weeds too.

    So I do agree with the idea. I just take issue with the "this covers *everything*" feel I'm getting. :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Cassia,

    As always, I appreciate your comments, I totally see where you are coming from as far as the impression that wellness covers everything, and my response is that in all reality, with few exceptions, it may just be that good. Let me explain:

    I do recognize the reality of organisms which can cause illness (infection was one of the leading killers prior to the 20th century). HIV, however, is a special case as far as viruses (viri?) go.

    I also recognize that there are rare genetic problems that people are born with (which are exhibited at birth like trisomy 21 and sickle cell anemia), but for far greater than 90% of us, we got here with great genes.

    I fully recognize genetic variance and that some of us have genetic susceptibilities to certain illnesses if supplied with the specific environmental trigger and without that environmental trigger the sickness doesn't exist. When people become sick in this manner should we blame the genes or the poor environment?

    When we (the >90%) have problems, it is the direct result of living in an environment incongruent with our genes. Our genes were suited for a certain environment, and when we supply an environment that our genes were not intended for (think industrial conditions like those in America) we experience illness (symptomatic or asymptomatic). Some illnesses develop slowly over time creating a false sense of security until the symptoms appear leaving the afflicted completely baffled as to the cause (this is the heart disease, type 2 diabetes, certain cancers, depression, infertility, ADD, ADHD, acne, acid reflux, strokes, metabolic syndrome, dementia, etc, basically anything you see advertised during the NEWS).

    I had not intended the concepts of wellness to mean that nothing bad will ever happen. What I meant to say is that whatever condition you are dealing with will absolutely be improved with lifestyle (improving the environment of how you eat, move, and think).

    Will Eating, Moving, and Thinking Well remove the symptoms of the disease? It depends on what extent the damage has been done.

    Will doing these things move you towards health regardless of your condition? Every time without exception.

    The problem is that because of our culture and our lifestyles, most people in America have never experienced Eating, Moving, and Thinking in the ways I'm proposing, most people have never had the experience of being truly WELL. In industrial environments most people think they are doing well and are actually far from. They think they are healthy, but they are actually "just not sick".

    ReplyDelete